On the other hand, it doesn't really matter how deep the ties between the CIA and "conservative CIA" foundations and NGOs are, as we-the-people are still totally confused as to what exactly "CIA" means. Certainly (even) more evidence would be welcome. There are a ton indications pointing in that direction, but it's still a bit of an assumption. So did the anti-Vietnam War protests and partly all the CIA investigations of the 1970s, all of which helped shift public attitude towards the left.Ĭonsidering the right is very much plugged into national security, ties to the DOD and CIA are much more direct than with its liberal CIA counterparts, where we more or less rely on the assumption that the Eastern Establishment Rockefeller clique has been fronting for the CIA since the start of the Cold War. JFK and LBJ of the 1960s also played a role. Foundations as Olin first arose in the 1970s as a counter to (Rockefeller) democrat Jimmy Carter, during which time inflation rose from about 4.5% to 11% and anti-"free enterprise" views increased in prominence. The Olin Foundation is defunct now, but a good number of others have picked up this gap, most notably the Mercer Family Foundation, which played an important role in bringing Donald Trump to power in 2016. Much of the funding for this network comes from a number of Christian-Zionist (neocon) foundations as Olin, Bradley and Scaife. All of them share extremist anti-communist views and, except for certain Christian anti-establishment groups, also an extremist pro-War on Terror stance. Click to see board compositions for 19 as well.Īs for the right, we're traditionally talking about the hardly acknowledged alliance between Christian conservatives, both establishment and "anti-establishment", and neocon Zionist elements. On the liberal "new left" side the classic examples have been the Rockefeller, Ford and Carnegie foundations - today supplemented with Open Society (Soros), Bill & Melinda Gates, NoVo (Warren Buffett) and many others. Strictly put, the terms "liberal CIA" and "conservative CIA" have been introduced by ISGP to denote anti-establishment controlled opposition movements with ties to a certain set of foundations which are historically said to serve as conduits for CIA operations. This is not just due to time constraints, but also because it is not clear yet how much tweaking and adding still needs to be done. And secondly, to identify a core structure within the conservative movement, making it easier to figure out who or what exactly the power behind the throne is here.Īlthough sources can always be found by clicking on the links to the individual point-summaries, notes in the following chapters are limited for now. Its purpose is the same too: organizing large amounts of information into a single file to prevent duplicate content from spreading throughout the site. Think tanks: national security and economics 1.Īs veteran ISGP readers might already suspect, this oversight and article is a mirror of ISGP's The Grassroots Myth: "Liberal CIA" Network of New Left Foundations, Media and Activist Groups.
"Populist" politicians and close allies 1.Īlt-right and Neocon anti-immigration NGOs 1. The neocon non-establishment III: James Woolsey
The neocon non-establishment II: non-independence The neocon non-establishment I: names and positions Pinochet: murder, torture and neoliberalism in Chile
0 kommentar(er)
